Christianity Today Online is featuring what amounts to a promotional piece on “spiritual directors” that caught my attention. The article introduces the practice of using spiritual directors to evangelicals, most of whom have never heard of them. The piece details the author, Alice Fryling’s, warm and positive experiences with the spiritual director she encountered in a mainline church near the University of Wisconsin many years ago.
At first glance, who would argue with a ministry that supposedly puts people in touch with hearing and seeing God in their lives? But looking at it all a little more closely, problems emerge. Nowhere in the article is there a caution about the dangers of spiritual direction that takes you away from the truth of the Word of God. There is much in the piece about the author’s feelings spiritually and how the spiritual direction affected her emotionally, but never does she tell readers to be careful about the counsel they are receiving from these individuals who are giving spiritual guidance. Nowhere does she recommend asking, “to where am I being directed spiritually by this person?” or tell readers how to know if they are being directed into grave spiritual error.
The vast majority of “spiritual directors” operate within the Roman Catholic and Episcopal traditions. Other mainline churches (apostate) have followed with their own brand of spiritual direction. All of it is rooted in contemplative spirituality. It is easy to see why. The Reformation brought us the crucial emphasis on the authority of Scripture in the lives of believers. Contemplative spirituality removes that landmark and replaces it with subjective mystical experiences. That’s why a “spiritual director” is a key part of the contemplative spiritual package.
I remember reading Karen Mains’ book, Lonely No More, many years ago, long before there was much of any information available on contemplative spirituality within evangelicalism. At that time, the Mains’ program, Chapel of the Air, was on hundreds of stations nationwide. Formerly conservative evangelicals, Karen and her husband, David, converted to the Episcopal church, and the book detailed her new found enthusiasm for contemplative spirituality. She talks about going to visit a nun/spiritual director and Jungian psychotherapist who counseled her. She describes using her imagination to conjure up an image of Jesus Christ, sitting at a table as a bald, drooling idiot child, among other bizarre things detailed in her writing. She also describes her personal spirit guide who appears in her dreams numerous times,
He was tall … well formed and trim, somewhere in his early thirties … His fine, dark hair fell in a thick lock across his forehead … his blue-gray eyes looking earnestly into mine…You are everything I have ever wanted spiritually,’ he said before I started to drive away…
Karen Mains writes that this creature in her dreams had a “positively profound effect” on her that caused her to seek further spiritual direction. The clear cut Word of God was no longer enough for Karen, and the disturbing fruit of her mystical proclivities was all over her book. Unrepentant years later, she writes about the book here:
…Lonely No More looks those lies finally in the eye and begins to deal with them honestly. “If my marriage is as perfect as I say it is, why am I so lonely?” “What are these dreams, these painful emotions, these attractions pointing to?” This book was extremely controversial in certain sections of ultra-conservative Christianity so I warn you, read it carefully. I stand behind every word, despite the controversy. It may even shake the ground beneath your feet. I will probably never write anything this well again. But I have certainly paid for the effort to be excellent, to be lovingly truthful, to want God.
Source
After Chapel of the Air became a venue for promoting contemplative spirituality, VCY America removed it from our network. The program was removed from numerous other stations and ultimately went off the air. But within another 10-15 years, the contemplative spirituality Karen had embraced had been mainstreamed within evangelicalism. That’s why Christianity Today has been promoting “spiritual direction” without any qualms about controversy today. Most Christian radio stations today would have little problem with what Karen Mains was promoting back then. Lighthouse Trails Research includes this warning on spiritual direction:
A 2003 Christianity Today article, Got Your Spiritual Director Yet?, confirms two things, one that spiritual direction is contemplative, and two that it is becoming a part of evangelical Christendom. The article explains that popular Christian author Larry Crabb is changing his views. Once a believer in psychology he is switching to spiritual direction. The article credits contemplatives (mystics) such as John Cassian and Ignatius of Loyola for getting spiritual direction into the church and suggests that we can learn more about it from Richard Foster, Eugene Peterson, and Dallas Willard – with this we completely agree. As Rick Warren stated in his book, Purpose Driven Church, Foster and Willard are key players in the Spiritual Formation movement, but while Warren says that this movement is a vital wake up call for the church, we say it is a terrible seduction for the church.
Source
For a closer look at the contemplative spirituality we and others have been warning about, visit the Shalem Institute, an inter-spiritual organization dedicated to promoting spiritual formation through spiritual direction and all of contemplative spirituality. It is anything but rooted in the authoritative Word of God, and it is leading to a New Spirituality that runs counter to the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
If Christianity Today is not intending to promote what the Shalem Institute is teaching, where are the warnings? Where is the counsel to be vigilant about those who are promoting a broad spiritual path in opposition to the Word of God? Before you jump on the contemplative/spiritual direction bandwagon, you need to answer that question.